Contents
There's persistent confusion around first person versus third person in academic writing. Many students believe all academic writing must be third person. In UK dissertations, this is both partly true and complex. Most programmes now accept first person for reflexive sections but expect third person for findings presentation.
The relationship between your research question and your theoretical framework is one of the most important aspects of any dissertation, as the theoretical perspective you adopt will influence how you collect data and interpret your findings. Students sometimes treat theory as an abstract exercise that is disconnected from the practical work of research, but in reality your theoretical framework provides the conceptual tools that allow you to make sense of what you observe. Reviewing the theoretical literature in your field will help you identify the major schools of thought that have shaped current understanding and will allow you to position your own research within that intellectual picture. Your marker will expect you to demonstrate not only that you are aware of the relevant theoretical debates in your field but also that you have thought carefully about how those debates relate to your own research design and findings.
When Third Person Is Expected
In your findings or results chapter, present data and findings in third person. "The data revealed three key themes" rather than "I found three key themes". "Participants described..." rather than "My participants described...". "Analysis shows..." rather than "I show...".
In your discussion of existing literature, use third person. "Smith (2020) argues that..." not "I read in Smith...". "Research suggests..." not "I believe...".
In your theoretical analysis, use third person. "Social capital theory proposes..." not "I think social capital theory...".
In your conclusion, mostly third person. Though your conclusion can include more reflection, the substantive claims should be third person. "The research demonstrates..." rather than "I've shown...".
The point of third person in these sections is to present your findings and analysis as evidence-based rather than opinion-based. Third person creates distance between you and your claims. The claims stand on the evidence, not on your personal belief.
The scope of your dissertation, meaning the boundaries you set around what your research will and will not investigate, is one of the most important decisions you will make before you begin your writing. A dissertation that attempts to cover too much ground will inevitably lack the depth and focus that markers expect, while one that is too narrowly focused may struggle to generate findings that are meaningful or considerable. Defining your scope clearly in the introduction of your dissertation, and returning to it in the methodology chapter to justify the limits you have set, demonstrates to your marker that you have thought carefully about the design of your study. It is perfectly acceptable for your scope to change slightly as your research progresses, provided that you reflect on those changes honestly and explain in your dissertation why you decided to adjust the boundaries of your investigation.
When First Person Is Acceptable and Increasingly Encouraged
In your methodology chapter, particularly in sections on research design choices and researcher positionality, first person is increasingly accepted and sometimes encouraged.
"I chose qualitative methodology because..." is now acceptable in most UK programmes. "The researcher's positionality is important to acknowledge: I came to this research with a background in social work, which shaped my understanding of welfare policy..." This is more engaging than "The researcher came to this research with a background..."
First person is particularly important in reflexivity sections. Reflexivity means thinking about how your own background, beliefs, and position shaped your research. First person is clearer here. "I recognised bias in my initial coding when I noticed I was interpreting ambiguous statements more sympathetically from participants with similar backgrounds to me" is clearer than "The researcher recognised bias...".
Some programmes now prefer first person throughout, arguing that it's more honest about researcher involvement and more engaging to read. But third person remains the default for findings and discussion in most UK programmes.
Check your programme's guidance. Some are explicit about this.
What Third Person Actually Looks Like
Here's a paragraph from a findings section written in third person:
"Analysis of interview transcripts revealed three distinct ways that participants understood their benefit removal. First, participants described the process as abrupt and unanticipated. The majority of respondents reported receiving minimal warning before benefit cessation. Second, participants interpreted the decision as unjust. They described their applications for reconsideration or appeal as meeting barriers that felt insurmountable. Third, participants reported substantial practical consequences. Most described falling into debt or housing insecurity within weeks of benefit removal."
Notice how "participants", "analysis", "the majority", and "the decision" are the subjects of sentences, not "I" or "we". This creates the sense that the findings are standing alone, not filtered through the researcher's personal lens.
Here's the same paragraph in first person:
"In my analysis of interview transcripts, I identified three distinct ways that participants understood their benefit removal. First, most of my respondents reported that the process was abrupt and unanticipated, with minimal warning before benefit cessation. Second, the participants I interviewed interpreted the decision as unjust, describing their applications for reconsideration as meeting insurmountable barriers. Third, I found that most of my participants experienced substantial practical consequences, falling into debt or housing insecurity within weeks of benefit removal."
Both are clear. The first feels more objective; the second feels more personal. Your programme will have a preference.
The Passive Construction as an Alternative
In some STEM fields and some traditional academic writing, passive voice is used as an alternative to third person.
"Data were collected using semi-structured interviews." "Participants were recruited through disability charities." "Results were analysed using thematic analysis."
This removes any personal agent entirely. It's impersonal. It's used heavily in experimental science dissertations.
Passive voice can feel stilted in social science and humanities writing. "It was found that participants experienced difficulties" is weaker than "Participants experienced difficulties" or "The analysis revealed that participants experienced difficulties."
Most modern guidance suggests using active voice even when you want to avoid first person. "The analysis revealed..." is active and third person. It's clear and strong.
Why the Distinction Matters
The distinction between first and third person matters because it signals something about knowledge. Third person suggests the findings are objective and evidence-based. First person suggests they're your interpretation.
This isn't actually true. All research is interpreted by researchers. Your positionality, your background, your decisions shape your analysis. Third person doesn't make findings more objective; it just presents them as if they're.
But academically, this convention persists. Third person in findings sections is the default in most UK academic programmes because it follows established conventions about how academic knowledge is presented.
This is changing gradually. More researchers are arguing that honesty requires acknowledging researcher involvement. Some programmes now encourage first person throughout, arguing it's more transparent.
Your job is to follow your programme's expectations. If your programme prefers third person for findings, use third person. If it's moving towards acceptance of first person, talk to your supervisor about their preference.
How to Check Your Writing
Go through your findings chapter and circle every instance of "I" or "we". Ask yourself: does this sentence need to be in first person? If it's a sentence like "I conducted interviews", third person works fine: "Interviews were conducted" or "This study involved interviews". If it's a sentence like "I recognised bias in my analysis", first person works better and might belong in a reflexivity section anyway.
Check your discussion chapter. The same principle applies. Can you remove "I" without losing clarity? Can you convert "I argue that..." to "The evidence suggests..." or "This analysis proposes..."?
Read your draft aloud. First person jumps out to the ear. If you're hearing "I" repeatedly and your programme expects third person, that's feedback to revise.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I use "we" instead of "I" to avoid first person? A: "We" is first person plural, so it has the same issue as "I". It was traditionally used to make the researcher feel less prominent ("We conducted interviews"), but modern guidance suggests it's awkward because often only one person conducted the research. Avoid "we" unless multiple people truly did the research collaboratively. Use third person or "I" instead.
Q: Is it unprofessional to use "I" in my dissertation? A: No. Increasingly, first person is considered professional and honest. The idea that academic writing must be impersonal is outdated. Many top academic journals now encourage first person. Check your programme's guidance and your supervisor's preference. If your programme accepts or encourages first person, using "I" isn't unprofessional.
Q: What if my supervisor says one thing and my programme's guidance says another? A: Follow your supervisor's guidance. They're assessing your dissertation. If they've a preference that differs from the general guidance, follow their preference. That said, if this happens, ask your supervisor to clarify the reasoning so you understand their position.
---
---
Choosing an appropriate research methodology is one of the most consequential decisions you will make during your dissertation, as the methods you select will shape every aspect of your data collection and analysis process. Qualitative research methods are generally most appropriate when you are trying to understand the meanings, experiences, and perspectives of participants, while quantitative methods are better suited to testing hypotheses and measuring relationships between variables. Many dissertations combine both qualitative and quantitative approaches in what is known as a mixed-methods design, which can provide a richer and more complete picture of the research problem than either approach could achieve alone. Whatever methodology you choose, you must be able to justify your selection clearly and demonstrate that your chosen approach is consistent with your research question, your philosophical assumptions, and the practical constraints of your study.
How long does it typically take to complete Dissertation Writing?
The time required depends on the complexity and length of your specific task. As a general guide, allow sufficient time for research, planning, writing, revision and proofreading. Starting early is always advisable, as it allows time for unexpected challenges and produces higher-quality results.
Can I get professional help with my Dissertation Writing?
Yes, professional academic support services are available to help with all aspects of Dissertation Writing. These services provide expert guidance, quality-assured work and personalised feedback tailored to your institution's specific requirements. Visit dissertationhomework.com to explore the support options available.
What are the most common mistakes in Dissertation Writing?
The most frequent mistakes include poor planning, insufficient research, weak structure, inadequate referencing and failure to proofread thoroughly. Many students also struggle with maintaining a consistent academic voice and critically evaluating sources rather than merely describing them.
How can I ensure my Dissertation Writing meets university standards?
Ensure you understand your institution's marking criteria and style requirements. Use credible academic sources, maintain proper referencing throughout, follow a logical structure and conduct multiple rounds of revision. Seeking feedback from supervisors or professional services also helps identify areas for improvement.
Related Articles
- The Complete Guide to Writing a Dissertation in the UK: A Thorough Overview
- The Complete Guide to Writing a First-Class Dissertation in the UK [PILLAR PAGE]
- Dissertation Methodology Chapter: The Complete Writing Guide
- How to Select the Best Dissertation Writing Service: A Student Guide
- Dissertation Abstract Writing Guide: Step-by-Step
- Writing a Dissertation Introduction: Step-by-Step Guide
Need Expert Help With Your Dissertation?
Our UK based experts are ready to assist you with your academic writing needs.
Order NowFrequently Asked Questions
What is the typical structure of a UK dissertation?
A standard UK dissertation includes an introduction, literature review, methodology chapter, findings and analysis, discussion, and conclusion. Some programmes may also require a reflective section or recommendations chapter.
How long should each chapter of my dissertation be?
As a general guide, your literature review and analysis chapters should each represent roughly 25 to 30 percent of the total word count. Your introduction and conclusion should be shorter, typically 10 to 15 percent each.
When should I start writing my dissertation?
Begin writing as soon as you have a confirmed topic and initial reading done. Starting the literature review early helps identify gaps and refine your research questions before data collection begins.
What is the best way to start working on Dissertation Writing?
Begin by carefully reading your assignment brief and identifying the key requirements. Then conduct preliminary research to understand the scope of existing literature. Create a structured plan with clear milestones before you start writing. This systematic approach ensures you build your work on a solid foundation.
Conclusion
Producing outstanding work in Dissertation Writing is entirely achievable when you approach it with the right mindset, proper planning and access to quality resources. The strategies outlined in this guide provide a clear pathway from initial research through to final submission. Remember that excellence comes from sustained effort, attention to detail and a willingness to revise and improve your work. For expert support with dissertation writing, the team at Dissertation Homework is here to help you succeed.
Key Takeaways
- Start early and create a structured plan with clear milestones
- Conduct thorough research using credible academic sources
- Follow a logical structure and maintain a consistent academic voice
- Revise your work multiple times, focusing on different aspects each round
- Seek professional support when you need expert guidance for Dissertation Writing
