Putin's Influence in Post-Cold War Europe

During the era of the Cold War, the Western communities' short ideological aspiration from Moscow coupled with political support and financial help. The Soviet Union was more than happy to oblige. After 25 years of the fall of the Berlin, war communism was buried deep under the ground; European political leaders were reviving their ties with Russia for a varied set of reasons (Feuer and Higgins, 2016). Marine Le Pen, leader of the France first national party, exhibited her awe for Putin. In specific interviews, it was stated that there was a cold war raging against Putin, by the European Union at the interest of the United States defending their interest. Marine Le Pen, praised Putin's brand of nationalism as he managed to restore contentment and pride. Le Pen is one of the few European leaders supporting Putin. However, it all comes down to one query, which is to understand the importance of Putin within the European Union. Putin is recognised as a protector of continental European values (Wagner and Fein, 2016). The other European leaders support and stood by the Russian leader’s conservative position such as issues pertaining to homosexuality, while people extended their support for gay rights in the West. This leader additionally shares common opponents. Putin put up strong opposition to the European Union and used it as the eastward expansion of the block as an encroachment on Russia's traditional domain of influence. The majority of Europe states perceive the European Union as equally hegemonic. The state that it is depriving European member states of their sovereignty and many are planning to break away from it (Dyson and Parent, 2018)

However, it is the style of leadership put forward by Vladimir Putin, which speaks best for itself and the attraction given to the Russian leader. Starting with the consecutive world war years, the far-right has constantly searched for strong leaders who can influence a dedicated mass of followers. For example, Benito Mussolini was the first, do not secure leaders who were idolised by the extremist right. Margaret Thatcher, who was known for her firm grip on respective parliaments and party wears kept at highest by the right for their nationalist and anti-leftist position. At this present time, Vladimir Putin fills that role (Glasser, 2019). The Russian leader provides just what is right in today's demands. In Western Europe, the economic deterioration and austerity policies within the European Union contributed to the rise in public agony about everything from immigration to liberalism. Putin developed his life and political career with the sole perspective of rebuilding Moscow's prestige. Similarly, they perceive assertive ethno-nationalism within Russia as an answer to the European worries.

While all these sycophants provide the much-needed help to the Russian leader, Moscow is interested in building relations with Europe's far-right group with the sole purpose of diminishing its international isolation. However, it becomes important to understand the fact that the role of the Russian leader extends beyond the existing international ties (Robertson and Greene, 2017). In order to perceive the power of the Russian leader, it is important to highlight a certain incidence within the country that establishes and reinforces the image of Putin as a strong leader. Westerners who are accustomed to seeing Putin strutting in front of the media; projecting an aura of command switch statement sounds overwhelming. Vladimir Putin has made the current system act as per his commands. The same holds true for issues that ensure his grip on power like breaking the political opposition and disobedient oligarchs (Wilson, 2018). After Vladimir Putin came to power, he curbed the conspicuous disorder, which was carried under the supervision of his drunken predecessor Boris Yeltsin, who left a state which was barely functional. The construction of a new rocket launch in the Far East of Russia put the Russian leader as the Russia biggest and ambitious political representatives (McFaul, 2018).

The presidency operated by Vladimir Putin did not work in a vacuum and was often subject to easy judgment on the foundation of decontextualised absolutism of principles that feels to encompass the real-time challenges the Russian government was subjected to under the presidency of Vladimir Putin. The challenge phrase from the insurgency of Chechen, coupled with incursion beyond the republic into Moscow with theatre siege of Dubrovka, contesting the political order even in the long-established democracy (Letterman, 2018). The teleological implementation of transitional paradigm, focus on the mechanics of democracy-building but pay attention to the geopolitics and limited history leading to destruction in Russia. The logical inconsistencies are enveloping the authority executed by Vladimir Putin mirror those of the social build he drove. Vladimir Putin came to control with the prime Moto on reestablishing the state however he was additionally there to the custom inside which the state spoke to both most elevated desire of society for endurance inside the states of difficulty. All through his administration level, Putin spoke to the standards of reassertion, security and solidification of the rights of the state (Vice, 2017). Anyway, the current ideas of anti-extremism and advance towards typical governmental issues were assailed by a progression of opposing essentials. These logical inconsistencies are reflected in the focal issue confronting any examination of Vladimir Putin's authority: the conceivable idea of his current statism. It is anything but difficult to distinguish the conceivable pressure inside the undertaking proposed by Putin, yet these strains are themselves the wellspring of his capacity. He had the option to move tight ideological groups by particular access to the political cleavages during the time of innovation (Eksi and Wood, 2019). The present Russian pioneer had the option to accommodate a progression of arrangements and gatherings that in a prior period would have been strife uncommonly working with the optimistic white-collar class.

The working style exhibited by putting make seen and the political and highly technocratic. However, as a leader, he was able to confront the need to reconcile a conflicting range of views and interests by proving himself as a highly suitable politician, making him a political hero in the European nation (Finch, 2018). The technocratic approach implemented by Putin into managing public affairs was accompanied by charisma. Vladimir Putin was not naturally charismatic; rather, his personality reflected not only the grandeur but unique mix of vulnerability and disillusionment that was witnessed within the Russian States. The leadership represented by Vladimir Putin was highly distinctive due to the neo authoritarian stabilisation that failed to renounce the existing democratic principle within the constitution (Treisman, 2016). However, the Russian leader did not allow the full potential of the democratic to emerge.

The majority rule system in Russia is bound with the obligation of making the condition for their own reality to which Putin included this wasn't possible by adhering to the selective standards of vote based system. There stays a fundamental duality between the objectives and the real practice, which is for all time undermined. The power of the leader is evaluated both on the country's strength and capacity that they exercise unilaterally by other institutions (Pavlovsky, 2016). Combining the mentioned metrics, it becomes easier to perceive why Vladimir Putin is perceived as a hero in the European Union. Vladimir Putin has developed a vertical of power, with the entire political power resting on one man. In order to understand the Russian leader, it is important to understand Russia. The last century witnessed the downfall of the monarchy, the collapse of democracy depression and World War 2 that caused the death of 10 million individuals in Russia (Zakaria, 2017). Stalin's brutality and the collapse of communism created years of corruption and chaos. It is Putin who establishes stability, enhancing the popular perception coupled with rising standards of lifestyle. At this current time; Russia exhibits intense national pride being the largest country on the planet, encompassing 11 time zones in Europe, Asia and the Middle East (Zakaria, 2017). Russia is a rich country encompassing a series of raw material deposits from natural gas and oil to aluminium and nickel. Vladimir Putin understands Russia and the world, is not enough; do not make a frontal assault on Europe or American regions. The Russian leader additionally understands the possibilities of vulnerabilities of a free society; there are reasons for internal discord and division (Sakwa, 2008).

The Russian leader understands the possible fragility of institutions, such as the European Union and perceptions like diversity and integration. The segmented regionalism gathered evident response when the Russian leader in order to restore the authority of the state (Mrachek, 2016). However, the decision made to make the constitution the centre of the relation between regions and central was subjected to conflict. The model proposed by putting of liberal republicanism gives rise to individual citizenship as opposed to the traditional communitarian perception. Hence it can be conclusively stated, the leadership established and coined by the Russian leader Vladimir Putin is a social contract with people representing a discontinuous break with Yeltsin years (Osborn, 2018).

However, that remains committed to modernising a norm associated with liberal economic change and integration with the current capitalist West. Vladimir Putin social contract promises time the payment of social benefits and payments while meeting the standards of improving social life to protect the current society from demagogy of the earlier oligarch structure; irrespective of all these factors the reformism to gain equal and universal citizenship (Feuer and Higgins, 2016). The Russian leader sought to surpass the possible antinomies, while traditionally marking the rational of modernisation at the same time generating a series of contradictions. The motto was to translate modernisation blockage in Russia by rejecting ideas pertaining to alternative modernity. However, while coming in terms with the contemporary modernity needs to be proved to be against high contradiction. Conservative figures in America have been attracted to the rhetoric exhibited by Putin with a clear concentration on the traditional Western Christian values with the rejection of degradation and primitivism has created a moral crisis in the West (Wilson, 2018). Putin has developed himself as a defender of traditional norms morality by opposing same-sex partner and penalising divorce. Furthermore, European countries are followers of Christianity. Similarly, Putin has transformed himself as an object of veneration for the female individuals in Russia and other parts of Europe perceive that a tough prime minister like Putin is a reincarnation of Paul the Apostle, from the early Christian missionary (Osborn, 2018). Putin is perceived as a defender of mainland European qualities. The other European pioneers support and remained by the Russian chiefs’ moderate position, for example, issues relating to homosexuality, while individuals broadened their help for gay rights in the West. This pioneer furthermore shares normal adversaries. Putin set up a solid resistance to the European Union and utilised it as the eastbound development of the square as an infringement on Russia's conventional space of impact (Osborn, 2018). Most European states see the European Union as similarly domineering.

Anyway, it is the style of an initiative set forward by Vladimir Putin which talks best for itself and the fascination given to the Russian chief. With the back to back world war years, the extreme right has continually scanned for solid pioneers who can impact a committed mass of adherents. For instance, Benito Mussolini was the first; don't make sure about pioneers who were adored by the radical right. Margaret Thatcher, who was known for her solid hold on particular parliaments and gathering wears kept at most noteworthy by the for directly for their patriot and hostile to liberal position. Right now, Vladimir Putin fills that job. The Russian head gives exactly what is directly in the present requests. Hence, it can be conclusively stated that the Europeans are highly influenced by strong leaders, such as Benito Mussolini and Margaret Thatcher. Vladimir Putin harbours the same aura making it increasingly appealing to the European citizens. Hence, based on the above instances and interventions, it can be clearly concluded that Vladimir Putin is genuinely a strong leader in the European continent.

Reference list

Dyson, S.B. and Parent, M.J., 2018. The operational code approach to profiling political leaders: understanding Vladimir Putin. Intelligence and National Security, 33(1), pp.84-100.

Eksi, B. and Wood, E.A., 2019. Right-wing populism as gendered performance: Janus-faced masculinity in the leadership of Vladimir Putin and Recep T. Erdogan. Theory and Society, 48(5), pp.733-751.

Feuer, A. and Higgins, A., 2016. Extremists turn to a leader to protect Western values: Vladimir Putin. New York Times, 3, p.89.

Finch III, R.C., 2018. Vladimir Putin and the Russian Military. South Central Review, 35(1), pp.48-73.

Glasser, S.B., 2019. Putin the Great: Russia's Imperial Impostor. Foreign Aff., 98, p.10.

Letterman, C., 2018. Image of Putin, Russia Suffers Internationally. Pew Research Center, 6, p.41st.

McFaul, M., 2018. Russia as It Is A Grand Strategy for Confronting Putin. Foreign Aff., 97, p.82.

Pavlovsky, G., 2016. Russian Politics under Putin: The System Will Outlast the Master. Foreign Aff., 95, p.10.

Robertson, G. and Greene, S., 2017. The Kremlin Emboldened: How Putin Wins Support. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), pp.86-100.

Sakwa, R., 2008. Putin's leadership: Character and consequences. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(6), pp.879-897.

Treisman, D., 2016. Why Putin Took Crimea: The Gambler in the Kremlin. Foreign Aff., 95, p.47.

Vice, M., 2017. Publics worldwide unfavorable toward Putin, Russia. Pew Research Center, August, 16.

Wagner, A. and Fein, E., 2016. Vladimir Putin as a political leader: Challenges to an adult developmentally-informed analysis of politics and political culture. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 21(2), p.204.

Wilson, K., 2018. Ruling Russia: Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin.