A Seasonal Analysis of Common Cold Incidence

During the lockdown phase, almost 90% of the participants never contracted the common cold in the spring season, while 81% never caught cold in the autumn season and 65% participants never caught common cold in the winter season. Similarly, 9% participants only caught the common cold once in the spring season during the lockdown, while 9% participants also caught the cold only once in the autumn season. However, during winter most of the participants (almost 30%) only caught the cold once. The results further show that 2% participants caught cold twice in spring season in the lockdown phase; 9% participants caught common cold twice in autumn season and only 4.65% participants caught the cold twice during the winter season. The data further shows that none of the participants had caught the common cold more than twice during the lockdown period. This can be shown through the fact that none of the participants caught the common cold in any of the three seasons thrice or even four times in the lockdown period. For those seeking to understand these trends more deeply, data analysis dissertation help can provide essential insights and methodologies.

On the other hand, the data is entirely different for the non-pandemic years. This is because of the fact that nearly 70% of the candidates never caught cold in spring season, while 58% participants never caught the common cold in autumn season and 25% participants never caught the cold in the winter season. However, 25% participants caught the cold once in spring, 30% caught cold in autumn and 65% caught cold in winter season. On the other end of the spectrum, 2% participants caught cold at least twice in spring, 9% participants caught cold in the autumn season in the non-pandemic years and 4% caught the common cold in winter season during a non-pandemic year. No participant caught cold thrice in spring season in a non-pandemic year, but it was not true for other seasons. This is because 2% participants caught the common cold thrice in autumn and 4% in the winter season. 2% participants caught the cold four times in the spring season, while no participant caught the cold four times in any of the rest of the seasons.

Spring

As per Chi-Square χ2 (2) = 4.941; p = 0.085. As the p-value is coming out to be more than the critical alpha value of 0.05, it can be said that there is no statistically significant association between the variables.

Autumn

As per Chi-Square χ2 (3) = 7.431; p = 0.059. As the p-value is coming out to be more than the critical alpha value of 0.05, it can be said that there is no statistically significant association between the variables.

Winter

As per Chi-Square χ2 (3) = 14.898; p = 0.002. As the p-value is coming out to be less than the critical alpha value of 0.05, it can be said that there is a statistically significant association between the variables.

From the above chart, it can be seen that 4.7% participants very rarely got together with their friends before the COVID-19 pandemic, while 11.9% participants very rarely got together with their family before the pandemic and 9.5% participants very rarely got together with their work colleagues before the COVID-19 outbreak happened. 2.3% participants got together with their friends every few months before the COVID-19 pandemic, 9.5% participants got together with their family every few months before the COVID-19 pandemic and 4.76% participants got together with their work colleagues every few months before the COVID-19 pandemic. The data further shows that nearly 7% participants got together with their friends once per month before the pandemic; while only 4.7% participants got together with their family once per month before the virus outbreak; but none of the participants got together with their work colleagues once per month before the pandemic. 40% participants met their friends weekly before the COVID-19 pandemic, while the rate of get togethers weekly with the family before the pandemic was 11.9% and 7.14% with work colleagues. 16% participants met their friends more than once per week before the pandemic, while 14.29% participants met their family more than once per week before the COVID-19 pandemic; and 9.5% participants, before the pandemic met their work colleagues for more than once per week. 28% of the participants got together with their friends on a daily basis before the pandemic, while 47% participants met their family daily before the pandemic and 69% daily met their work colleagues before the COVID-19 pandemic.

69.7% very rarely got together with their friends, 46.5% with their family and 65% with their work colleagues during the pandemic. Furthermore, 4.6% participants met their friends every few months during the COVID-19 pandemic, 9.3% met their family every few months and no participant met their work colleagues during the pandemic. 9.3% participants met their friends once per month during the COVID-19 pandemic, 9.3% met their family once per month and no participant met their work colleagues during the pandemic. 6.98% participants met their friends weekly during the COVID-19 pandemic, 9.3% met their family weekly and 9.3% participant met their work colleagues on a weekly basis during the pandemic. Almost 7% participants met their friends more than once per week during the COVID-19 pandemic, 4.65% met their family more than once per week and 2.33% participant met their work colleague more than once per week during the pandemic. 2.3% participants met their friends daily during the COVID-19 pandemic, 20.93% got together with their family daily and 23.26% participant met their work colleagues daily during the pandemic.

Friends

As per Chi-Square χ2 (7) = 50.376; p = 0.000. As the p-value is coming out to be less than the critical alpha value of 0.05, it can be said that there is a statistically significant association between the variables.

Family

As per Chi-Square χ2 (7) = 41.778; p = 0.000. As the p-value is coming out to be less than the critical alpha value of 0.05, it can be said that there is a statistically significant association between the variables.

Work Colleagues

As per Chi-Square χ2 (5) = 32.199; p = 0.000. As the p-value is coming out to be less than the critical alpha value of 0.05, it can be said that there is a statistically significant association between the variables.

Take a deeper dive into A Comprehensive Analysis of Corporate Characteristics in Multinational Enterprises with our additional resources.