This is a review of chapter 1 and 2 of the book ‘Big capital: Who is London for?’ authored by Anna Minton. In these two chapters, Anna talks about how bad housing crisis is, in London. She stresses that it is very bad and that it is not some first world problem facing the privileged southerners moaning because of living in the zone 3 part of the London underground, or that they cannot afford like when mummy and daddy did at the time they were newlyweds, to either reside in Islington or Chelsea (Minton, 2017). Anna stresses that it is also not concerned with the streets were the Paddington bear may have resided, getting sold to the Sheikhs or to the orgarchs and later on left empty-handed. The author noted that housing crisis in London is about mothers having to share single room flats together with their children in various satellite towns, whereby, they are not able to afford train fares that can take them to their relatives, make hospital appointments or go to work. She notes that it is about victims that have fallen victims of human trafficking, whereby, they get moved from a particular illegal garden to another shed. It is also like having professionals in their mid and late 30s being shuttled from a particular inadequate housing flat to another by price-hiking landlords, and various mental health and misery problems, which come owing to insecure home. It is also about economic damages that a city faces, which contribute to the tax revenue of the nation, especially when businesses, as well as essential services cannot get their required staff, simply because they are not able to afford a home (Minton, 2017). For those seeking solutions or more insights into such issues, UK dissertation help can provide valuable support and guidance.
These two chapters do not attempt to address any crisis that are caused by housing crisis in London. Rather, they indicate that there are government policies that are making the situation worse and there is little sign of improvement in the future. Moreover, the facts connected with the provisions in this chapter are not too strong. Anna states the case of housing crisis in London clearly and demonstrates it by communicating with various dislocated individuals, as well as struggling people that are affected. Significantly, she provides factors- not side effects of various inevitable workings that are happening in the free market but are posing consequences to London’s runaway success. Notably, Anna anatomizes with various devices, which purpose to enable various developers to be able to wriggle out their personal obligation towards assisting with the provision of affordable housing (Minton, 2017). Also, the pressures that are applied to various local authorities to be able to maximize their returns of most of their properties at all costs, even when they are not interested to do so. Clearly, Anna tells these stories, which are not regarded as new but worthy of repetition, especially the story of social housing adopted by Margaret Thatcher’s rights to buy policies, with consequent ballooning of the expenditure on significant housing benefits that ought to be followed by various punitive measures that are addressing a problem, which the government makes but are paid for by individuals that are least in a position of doing so. Of importance to note, is that Anna points out the way it is wasteful, and as well unproductive, passing public funds to private landlords. Evidently, she describes certain grotesque products of situations created due to successful policies initiated by the government; including raiding of significant parasitic consultancies, which often show off their ability of enriching their clients through gaming the system (Minton, 2017).
Chapter 1 and 2 of this book notes that the current problems in London are resulting not only because of idiocy, and greed, but also due to the responses on whatever were regarded as genuine problems. The author notes that no individual ought to be nostalgic, whilst comparing the problems in London to the pre-Thatcher era, thereby forgetting various oppressions that resulted when various local authorities posed as the biggest landlords in various flats in the city. Clearly, not all developers should be seen as avaricious monsters. Contrary to this, it is hard not being furious regarding the knuckleheaded policy wonks, as well as ministers that apparently are armed with the GCSE in believing in Thatcherism, despite the existing evidence to that such concepts will invariably get their answers. These two chapters are not perfect, because some of the explanations that Anna makes are sketchy and hard following. Moreover, it is evident that some of the examples she used had been used elsewhere. In her world, she believes that every action that leads into a developmental business should be regarded as a suspect. It is implacable that without evident, there exists a bad thing, especially when various council estates are destroyed and rebuilt (Minton, 2017).
It is worth noting that Anna overlooks various instances where some actions have been taken towards addressing the problems that she is talking about such as renting via Airbnb. In conclusion to the two chapters, it is significant to take note of the fact that Anna would have brought forth meaningful explanations on the two chapters if she could have purposed to be much more open to various aspects that she overlooked, which are not terrible as it is evident that she overlooked people, institutions, as well as actions, which could have contributed positively towards enhancing better housing in London (Minton, 2017). She ought to have provided significant examples of various ways that could aid in building homes, as well as neighbourhood, and these include community land trusts, in which case, profits can be returns, with the aim of benefitting local communities, as well as rents, which reflect on the local income levels. Anna talks about the virtues associated with self-building, civilised public housing forms, as well as co-housing, yet she does not pull significant suggestions that can bring forth a credible action plan. Moreover, she managed to pull through a difficult task, owing to the fact that the fundamental instincts provided in the two chapters are right. Overall, it is worth noting that London’s current housing state is going to require determined public actions, as well as creativity to change it (Minton, 2017).
Continue your exploration of What Does Freedom Mean to Me with our related content.
Minton, A. (2017). Big capital: Who is London for? Penguin UK.
Academic services materialise with the utmost challenges when it comes to solving the writing. As it comprises invaluable time with significant searches, this is the main reason why individuals look for the Assignment Help team to get done with their tasks easily. This platform works as a lifesaver for those who lack knowledge in evaluating the research study, infusing with our Dissertation Help writers outlooks the need to frame the writing with adequate sources easily and fluently. Be the augment is standardised for any by emphasising the study based on relative approaches with the Thesis Help, the group navigates the process smoothly. Hence, the writers of the Essay Help team offer significant guidance on formatting the research questions with relevant argumentation that eases the research quickly and efficiently.
DISCLAIMER : The assignment help samples available on website are for review and are representative of the exceptional work provided by our assignment writers. These samples are intended to highlight and demonstrate the high level of proficiency and expertise exhibited by our assignment writers in crafting quality assignments. Feel free to use our assignment samples as a guiding resource to enhance your learning.