Call Back

Opportunities in the Adoption of Modern Construction Techniques in the UK

Introduction and Background

The United Kingdom government's housing memoranda, coupled with the current business circumstances, presented the housebuilding industry with an inducement to produce more innumerable modern homes while advancing Modern Method Construction Composition (MMCC) all-embracing efficiency within the challenging building sector (Arif et al., 2017). Although, Atkinson and Jacobs (2020) argued that channelling resources into development and provision of low cost, good quality, secure, and environmentally friendly housing is not attractive to private investors particularly the social and vertical housing. On the other hand, modernisation has been claimed as the key-way-find to availing the challenges, it has been promulgated feeble at best in exercising or endorsement. Implementation entails a transformation period from subsisting methods, and it is in this period, the drawbacks will transpire.

In adoption of change in construction industry, six key stages are identified, representing the consistency among the processes that include formulating constructs, evolving examination, utilisation, evaluation, and enrichment. These drawbacks limit significantly adoption of modern construction techniques such as offsite manufacturing and slowing progress in improving time, cost, and quality. The measure of the new homes launched by the prominent housebuilders represented their effect on new housing development in the UK (Wellings 2006), which implies large firms' significance in taking up reform.

Factors Driving UK Housing Environment

As part of its renewable emissions commitment, the United Kingdom (UK) government has promised a mandated zero carbon building by 2016 (the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2020). In 2007, the government had committed to build more than 240,000 homes yearly, however, according to the report released by DCLG, completed homes in 2019 were approximately 170,000, the highest in over a decade. These missed targets come despite a sharp rise in demands for housing. In attempt to address the rising housing crises characterised by homelessness, overcrowding, and unsuitable housing conditions, the government announced in 2019 a plan to invest £9 billion towards delivering 250,000 homes by 2022 (Bulman, 2019). Thereby, the housing sector has also been required to develop further home building and industries becoming more constructive to levitate these plight. Automation would be a way to escape impoverishment and implement sustainable construction (Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), 2008). However, the proportion of advancement has been reported marginalised in UK house construction (Ball 1999; Barker 2003). It is misleading to assume good predictions from those profiles (Roskrow 2004; Pan et al. 2008).

According to Taylor (2010) and Chiang et al. (2006), offsite manufacture (OSM) in the construction industry faces several challenges ranging from cost performance caused by both labour and material cost, project performance, skilled labour shortage, low productivity, technological change, and demand for sustainability and efficiency. Alonso-Zandari and Hashemi (2016) argued that the industry does not attract enough talent to meet those retiring, the growing market demand, as well as change forced into the industry. In a survey conducted by Wang et al. (2016), 75% of the firms in the industry were expected to increase into workforce but it was estimated that 78% would have challenges in attracting and filling vacancy with qualified personnel. Demographically, the findings by Sokas et al. (2019) showed that 21 of the workforce in the industry are above 55 years while only 9% are below 24 years. This disparity induces two major problems. First, the lack of technology-savvy younger who would otherwise push for integration of technology-driven approaches limits the industry in attempt to modernise. Secondly, as pointed by Lavallière et al. (2016) and Koh et al. (2019), lack of new idea and perspective on approach and process being used advances the status-quo in addition to lacking pushing factors to adopt change.

Houses completion

Influence of technology in the sector goes beyond fabrication but include modelling, transportation, communication, telematics, project management, and human resource management. Currently, such technological advancement such as Virtual Reality (VR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Augmented Reality (AR), robotics, 3D printing, and automatous vehicles are being integrated and poised to significantly influence operations and performance of the entire construction industry (Sun et al., 2017; Bilal et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016). However, it should be noted that successful adoption and integration of these technologies and new approaches, is subject to myriad factors that include perception of key players towards change, the incentives and push factors to adopting alternative and efficient methods. One can argue that ultimate de-skilling of designers from creators to specifiers would lead to higher productivity. The findings by Wang et al. (2020) on digital technology adoption in off-site construction (OSC) highlighted the approach significance in reducing resources wastes, enhancing productivity, and cutting cost and time as well as offering higher productivity and safety to the industry.

Cluster of factors

A 2017 survey on employer skills in the UK workforce conducted by Winterbotham et al. (2017 found that the employers face more challenges in recruiting skilled and experiences workforce particularly in technical and practical sector, similarly, the respondents noted skill shortages in their existing workforce. Some studies hold that the period from design stage to onsite assembly would actually be longer that traditional approach (Kilaire, and Stacey, 2017; Azman et al., 2013). According to Salama (2018) and Arashpour et al. (2016) planning and scheduling process required involve formulating and choosing relevant policies, procedures, and methods while constrained by available resource, quality, and productivity rate is mostly marred by lack of coordination and collaboration among key stakeholders on the project. Lean construction practices and design-build requiring high level of communication and coordination is core in enhancing productivity and efficiency (Hosseini et al., 2018).

Research Gap

From the literature, studies highlight the significance integration and implementation of OSC techniques would have to the UK’s construction industry ranging from advancing efficiency, reducing time and cost, improving quality, to enhancing productivity. From the literature, the current OSC is limited to lack of the capacity to respond to widespread demand, and on-demand. Therefore, the default, where capacity is unavailable, is traditional build methods. In the UK, the challenge is exacerbated by lack skilled and experienced workforce in the market to advance technology implementation in the sector coupled by low competition by organisations offering similar systems leading to a lack of competition. However, studies demonstrated the significant benefits, but it is counterintuitive to see low adoption rate particularly in the UK. As such, the big question is why the housebuilding and entire construction industry has been slow implementation and embracing technology-driven approach given its huge potential.

Research Aim and Objectives

Research aim

To investigate the recent United Kingdom housing policy changes, challenges/barriers, and drivers the UK's housebuilding sector faces, including proposing a data-driven strategy to address these (short, medium or long term).

Objective of the Research

1. To investigate in-depth the changes faced in the housebuilding sector in the United Kingdom Post Covid 19

2. To examine the influence of modernisation through the adoption of key drivers to offsite manufacturing approach to the UK housebuilding industry.

3. To investigate barriers and drawbacks faced in adopting MMC composition within the UK housebuilding industry.

4. To conduct a case study examining the problems in the MMC residential building sector in UK and compare case studies Malaysia.

5. To attain data-driven alternative resolutions from the UK & Malaysia sector and propose the most effective solution using MMC composition for output in the housebuilding industry.

The focus of this is exploring the changes being experienced by the homebuilding. Like any other sector, the change in the sector is inevitable. The heightening demands ranging from high quality to low cost expenditure from homeowners, regulators, and clients force contractors to seek alternative methods during construction while adhering to standards and codes. In addition to market demands, modernisation through technology is making ripple effect to the industry. For the traditional companies in the industry, integrating the changes can be a challenge. In order to get a glimpse of changes and understand their implication in the sector, this investigation will explore adoption of MMC within the UK housebuilding industry. The focus will be driven by capturing and understanding the barriers and drawbacks faced in the UK compared to Malaysian housebuilding industry. The dissertation addresses a large UK housebuilding company's problem study and explores tremendous life cycle reforms in the development response plan.

Proposed Methodology

Research Philosophy

The aim of this study is to investigate drawbacks faced by the UK’s house building industry and change integration within the sector. From the literature, several factors have limited the entire industry in implementation technology driven and adoption of such approach as prefabrication techniques. Studies point to such factors as lack of skilled and experienced workforce, lack of capacity to deliver volume to common designs, acceptance concern of key stakeholders on modular manufacturing, and limited by structural including policies driving the industry given that an evolving sector (Vernikos et al., 2014; Arif et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019; Nawi et al., 2014). Building from these, this investigative study will adopt an interpretivist paradigm.

Unlike positivism paradigm that perceive variables of a given a phenomenon in a measurable and verifiable manner, interpretivist argue that in social research participants hold different perspective, opinions, and point of view informed by one’s experiences (Alharahsheh, and Pius, 2020; Aliyu et al., 2014). In order to gain perspective and understand a given phenomenon, a research has to engage and hold direct in depth interaction with participants. In this case, the drawbacks faced by house building industry as well as developing passivity strategy as a response plan requires in depth interaction and engagement with key players in the field

Research Design

Building the assertion by Marczyk et al. (2021), research design outlines techniques chosen by a researcher encompassing various components to address the research question and attain the stipulated objectives in a systematic manner while handling the research problem efficiently. Ideally, a design adopted captures strategies integrated into the study to solve the outlined problem in a logical and coherent manner. A case study is a research follows a purview of applying theorised concepts and scientific assertion into real world scenario (Harrison et al., 2017). In the case of this study, modernisation in the industry that include integration of modelling technology, off-site fabrication, MNC, and integration management need to be tested in real world phenomenon to determine viability, and not just a computerised concept. Therefore, given that the focus of this research is determining the change implementation capturing the challenges and drawbacks faced in the housebuilding industry, it is prudent to have a real world scenario to examine. It worth noting that in any industry, modernisation comes with challenges including financial requirement, skills, maturity, regulations, and resistance. However, the challenges during implementation process is largely unique to the industry and scenario. Hence, the essence of having a case study. The UK housebuilding industry will be investigated as a case then compared to Malaysian sector.

Research Approach

For the qualitative, as described by Creswell (2014), involves collection and analysis of non-numerical data aimed to gain an insight of the problem, opinions, experiences, and point of view. In combining the two methods, one can map out number of participants answer to given questions while exploring individual reasons for holding that view. However, due to prolonged novel COVID-19 pandemic and following the UK government movement restrictions and lockdowns, the interactions with the participants with aim of attaining an in depth understanding on the issue will not be possible.

Constructive Research Approach (CRA)

Rautiainen et al. (2017) described CRA as an approach used in solving real world problems in a systematic and procedural manner. The constructions embody having a stepwise method such as mathematical algorithms aid in taking the scientific perspective into a real scenario and taking a world view. The Methodology captures statistical and data quantifying the problem through patterns, distribution, regression, mode, and mean (Goertzen, 2017; Bloomfield, and Fisher, 2019). In this case, the data from UK housebuilding industry will capture challenges faced in implementing changes towards modernisation. The key element is capturing the data from the housebuilders in the UK on drivers of offsite construction, MMC composition, and challenges experienced during implementation process.

The Design Science Research (DSR) approach extends Lukka (2003) assertion, which seeks to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Innovative construction research takes the form of assessing the performance of interventions or artefacts executed within the context of the intended use (Aken, 2004). This research approach to study and test construction is multiple case studies. The advanced research involved PAN-Asian cases studies compared to UK house building construction schemes through the modern construction method. Notwithstanding the finalisation of the designated framework, the application of Choosing by Advantages (CBA) in the case studies became an explication to afford a tool for optimising group determinations. The information gleaned from these reflections would then be used to the end of the fundamental reflective enrichment.

Research Limitations

The purpose of this research was to investigate the Offsite Construction / manufacturing and their integration to enhance the productivity of construction operations to investigate the barriers/ drawback to MMC. Although techniques, guidance and development successfully developed and tested on live projects (case studies) that demonstrated a considerable potential to improve cost and time savings and resource utilisations, it also has the following limitations:

There are social economical paradigms, however, due to insufficient time and other resources, this study has only investigated the implementation of MMC paradigm. This investigation has contributed by development OSC / MMC based on types of case studies, that is United Kingdom and Malaysia. However, construction sector involves various other types of processes as well throughout the timeline of a project. The developed cases have only taken the operation phase of a scheme into consideration. The most significant justification for this step is that OSC is most beneficial during with various scenarios. It does not take in to account other stages of any construction process like decisions making, logistics or risk modelling etc.

The enormous potential to improve resource utilisation and labour planning; however, the construction community as a whole to training or courses to understand its working, methodology, experimentation tools and ability to understand the generated results. Many companies, especially SMEs are not willing to spend resources on training or adopting new technology which is a significant barrier.

The data essential for the key development collected within the United Kingdom, and Malaysia, that these may not represent a generic picture of a construction process in other countries. Real life data was captured and used for the research are restricted due to literature. However, synthetic data was used for testing and validation purposes at later stages due to unavailability of similar case studies in the limited timeframe.

Expected Outcomes or Deliverables

Like any other industry, housebuilding has encountered several challenges over the past decades. The challenges ranging from changing business variables, heightening consumer demands and preferences, supporting materials and systems, stringent regulations and policy, increasingly scarcity in resources (land and financial), skills and knowledge, and technological advancement. In the UK, the changing industry demand balancing the development process and financial resources to drive the process while also taking into account demands and market parameters. Arguably, channelling resources into development and building houses that are of good quality, meet regulations, are safe, and cheap while also taking into account the environmental sustainability requires first gaining an insight and understanding the industry.

Key to this is having a perspective of both social and economic aspect driving the house building. Similarly, need for moderation in the industry such as following the building safety regulations, energy conservation, environmental consideration, and technologically up to date have collective pushed the industry investment idealism. Although modernisation concept is meant to push and offer solution to the challenges faced in the industry, some people such as developers and investors as a challenge in not just financial aspects but also the expertise and skills required to pioneer to drive.

Research Beneficiaries and Dissemination

Technological advancement such as prefabrication has been received positively by the developers and investor, and seen as a way forward of cutting cost and operating time as well as an approach of circumventing stringent restrictions and building code within the UK. Adoption of technology in the industry entails more than having the technology itself but rather the supporting features play an integral part. The big questions are: will prefabrication offer a better and more effective way of dealing with challenges faced in the constructions industry; will it be a lifeline or another challenging in the already troubled industry?

References

  • Agapiou, A. (2020). Factors influencing the selection of a procurement route for UK off-site housebuilding. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law, 1-13.
  • Agapiou, A. (2021). An exploration of the best value perceptions of small housebuilding developers towards offsite construction. Sustainability, 13(7), 4054.
  • Aken, J.E.V., 2004. Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field‐tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of management studies, 41(2), pp.219-246.
  • Alazzaz, F. and Whyte, A., 2015. Linking employee empowerment with productivity in off-site construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
  • Alhaddad, A. Y., Cabibihan, J. J., Hayek, A., & Bonarini, A. (2019). Data on the impact of objects with different shapes, masses, and impact velocities on a dummy head. Data in brief, 22, 344-348.
  • Alharahsheh, H.H. and Pius, A., 2020. A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), pp.39-43.
  • Aliyu, A.A., Bello, M.U., Kasim, R. and Martin, D., 2014. Positivist and non-positivist paradigm in social science research: Conflicting paradigms or perfect partners. J. Mgmt. & Sustainability, 4, p.79.
  • Alonso-Zandari, S. and Hashemi, A., 2016. Prefabrication in the UK housing construction industry. In 5th International Conference on Zero Energy Mass Customised Housing-ZEMCH (pp. 347-360).
  • Amin, M. M., Abas, N. H., Shahidan, S., Rahmat, M. H., Suhaini, N. A., Nagapan, S., & Rahim, R. A. (2017, November). A review on the current issues and barriers of Industrialised Building System (IBS) adoption in Malaysia’s construction industry. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 271, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing.
  • Arashpour, M., Wakefield, R., Abbasi, B., Lee, E.W.M. and Minas, J., 2016. Off-site construction optimization: Sequencing multiple job classes with time constraints. Automation in construction, 71, pp.262-270.
  • Arif, M., Killian, P., Goulding, J., Wood, G. and Kaushik, A., 2017. Barriers and challenges for offsite construction in UK housing sector.
  • Atkinson, R. and Jacobs, K., 2020. Coronavirus has shone a light on UK's housing crisis – here's how it can be fixed. [online] The Conversation. Available at: [Accessed 15 March 2021].
  • Azman, M.N.A., Ahamad, M.S.S., Majid, T.A., Yahaya, A.S. and Hanafi, M.H., 2013. Statistical evaluation of pre-selection criteria for industrialized building system (IBS). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(sup1), pp.S131-S140.
  • Ball, M., 2014. Rebuilding construction (Routledge revivals): Economic change in the British construction industry. Routledge.
  • Bilal, M., Oyedele, L.O., Qadir, J., Munir, K., Ajayi, S.O., Akinade, O.O., Owolabi, H.A., Alaka, H.A. and Pasha, M., 2016. Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Advanced engineering informatics, 30(3), pp.500-521.
  • Black, D., Pilkington, P., Williams, B., Ige, J., Prestwood, E., Hunt, A., ... & Scally, G. (2021). Overcoming Systemic Barriers Preventing Healthy Urban Development in the UK: Main Findings from Interviewing Senior Decision-Makers During a 3-Year Planetary Health Pilot. Journal of Urban Health, 1-13.
  • Bloomfield, J. and Fisher, M.J., 2019. Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), pp.27-30.
  • Bulman, M., 2019. 3 million more social homes needed to solve housing crisis, finds landmark review. [online] The Independent. Available at: [Accessed 15 March 2021].
  • Burgess, G., Jones, M., & Muir, K. (2018). BIM in the UK house building industry: opportunities and barriers to adoption. University of Cambridge Cambridge Centre for Housing & Planning Research.
  • Butt, B., Jones, R. V., & Fuertes, A. (2021). Opportunities and barriers to business engagement in the UK domestic retrofit sector: An industry perspective. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 42(3), 293-305.
  • Castella, T., 2015. Why can't the UK build 240,000 houses a year?. [online] BBC News. Available at: [Accessed 15 March 2021].
  • Cheng, D. and Ma, J., 2020. Research on the restrictive factors of the development of Chinese prefabricated buildings. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 531, No. 1, p. 012044). IOP Publishing.
  • Chiang, Y.H., Chan, E.H.W. and Lok, L.K.L., 2006. Prefabrication and barriers to entry—a case study of public housing and institutional buildings in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 30(3), pp.482-499.
  • De’Ath, M. and Farmer, M. 2020. Build Homes, Build Jobs, Build Innovation: A Blueprint for a Housing Led Industrial Strategy
  • Department for Communities and Local Government, 2017. Fixing our broken housing market. Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
  • Ebuchi, T., Toshikawa, T., Watanabe, S., Terada, Y., & Iwata, T. (2018). An ultra-wide range (0.01–240 Gbps) transmitter with latched AC-coupled driver and dummy data transient generator. IEICE Electronics Express, 15-20171151.
  • Gambatese, J.A. and Hallowell, M., 2011. Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 29(6), pp.553-567.
  • Gan, X., Chang, R. and Wen, T., 2018. Overcoming barriers to off-site construction through engaging stakeholders: A two-mode social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, pp.735-747.
  • Gan, X., Chang, R., Zuo, J., Wen, T., & Zillante, G. (2018). Barriers to the transition towards off-site construction in China: An Interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 8-18.
  • Goertzen, M.J., 2017. Introduction to quantitative research and data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), pp.12-18.
  • Great Britain. Treasury and HM Treasury, 2007. Meeting the Aspirations of the British people: 2007 pre-budget report and comprehensive spending review (Vol. 7227). The Stationery Office.
  • Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R. and Mills, J., 2017, January. Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 18, No. 1).
  • Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W. (2018). Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 649-660.
  • Hoover, S., Trombitas, P. and Cowles, E., 2017. Prefabrication: The changing face of engineering and construction. Denver: Fails Management Institute-FMI/BIMForum Prefabrication Survey.
  • Hosseini, M.R., Martek, I., Zavadskas, E.K., Aibinu, A.A., Arashpour, M. and Chileshe, N., 2018. Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A Scientometric analysis. Automation in Construction, 87, pp.235-247.
  • Hurlimann, A. C., Browne, G. R., Warren-Myers, G., & Francis, V. (2018). Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Australian construction industry–Impetus for regulatory reform. Building and Environment, 137, 235-245.
  • Kavak, H., Padilla, J. J., Lynch, C. J., & Diallo, S. Y. (2018, April). Big data, agents, and machine learning: Towards a data-driven agent-based modeling approach. In Proceedings of the Annual Simulation Symposium (pp. 1-12).
  • Koh, T.Y., Rowlinson, S. and Pollock, S., 2019. Dealing with Ageing Workforce in the Hong Kong Construction Industry: an Initial Exploration. In Creative Construction Conference 2019 (pp. 665-671). Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
  • Kolo, S.J., Rahimian, F.P. and Goulding, J.S., 2014. Offsite manufacturing construction: a big opportunity for housing delivery in Nigeria. Procedia Engineering, 85, pp.319-327.
  • Lavallière, M., Burstein, A.A., Arezes, P. and Coughlin, J.F., 2016. Tackling the challenges of an aging workforce with the use of wearable technologies and the quantified-self. Dyna, 83(197), pp.38-43.
  • Lukka, K., 2003. The constructive research approach. Case study research in logistics. Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series B, 1(2003), pp.83-101.
  • Marczyk, G.R., DeMatteo, D. and Festinger, D., 2021. Essentials of research design and methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, 2020. Number of new homes built soars to an 11 year high. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: [Accessed 15 March 2021].
  • Mulheirn, I., 2019. Tackling the UK housing crisis: is supply the answer. UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence.
  • Nawi, M.M., Hanifa, F.A., Kamar, K.M., Lee, A. and Azman, M.A., 2014. Modern method of construction: an experience from UK construction industry. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(5), pp.527-532.
  • Rautiainen, A., Sippola, K. and Mättö, T., 2017. Perspectives on relevance: The relevance test in the constructive research approach. Management Accounting Research, 34, pp.19-29.
  • Salama, T., 2018. Optimized Planning and Scheduling for Modular and Offsite Construction (Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University).
  • Shash, A. A., & Alawad, M. (2020). Modern Construction Methods (MMC) in Saudi Arabia: Evaluation Aspects and Barriers. Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 50-65.
  • Shen, J., Qin, Q., Wang, Y., & Sisson, M. (2019). A data-driven modeling approach for simulating algal blooms in the tidal freshwater of James River in response to riverine nutrient loading. Ecological Modelling, 398, 44-54.
  • Siebert, M. (2019). Concrete and the barriers to innovation in UK housebuilding (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
  • Siebert, M., Rodrigues, L., Gillott, M., Hines, E., & Rich, D. (2018). Identifying the barriers to change in the UK housebuilding industry. Future Cities and Environment, 4(1).
  • Silva, O. (2020). Modernizing the Dutch Housing Industry using offsite construction: Removing adoption barriers through innovation policy.
  • Sokas, R.K., Dong, X.S. and Cain, C.T., 2019. Building a sustainable construction workforce. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(21), p.4202.
  • Sooriyamudalige, N., Domingo, N., Shahzad, W., & Childerhouse, P. (2020). Barriers and enablers for supply chain integration in prefabricated elements manufacturing in New Zealand. International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 73-91.
  • Sun, C., Jiang, S., Skibniewski, M.J., Man, Q. and Shen, L., 2017. A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(5), pp.764-779.
  • Taylor, M.D., 2010. A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 28(8), pp.885-896.
  • Ullah, K., Lill, I., & Witt, E. (2019, May). An overview of BIM adoption in the construction industry: Benefits and barriers. In 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Vernikos, V.K., Goodier, C.I., Broyd, T.W., Robery, P.C. and Gibb, A.G., 2014. Building information modelling and its effect on off-site construction in UK civil engineering. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law, 167(3), pp.152-159.
  • Voordijk, J.T., 2019. Technological Mediation in Construction: Postphenomenological Inquiry into Digital Technologies. Journal of construction engineering and management, 145(12), p.04019084.
  • Wang, M., Wang, C.C., Sepasgozar, S. and Zlatanova, S., 2020. A Systematic Review of Digital Technology Adoption in Off-Site Construction: Current Status and Future Direction towards Industry 4.0. Buildings, 10(11), p.204.
  • Wilcox, S., Perry, J. and Williams, P., 2014. UK housing review. Coventry: Chartered institute of housing.
  • Williamson, M., Ganah, A., & John, G. A. (2019). Barriers to adopting modern methods of construction in the UK. Journal of Construction Engineering, 2(1), 30-39.
  • Winterbotham, M., Vivian, D., Kik, G., Hewitt, J.H., Tweddle, M., Downing, C., Thomson, D., Morrice, N. and Stroud, S., 2018. Employer skills survey 2017. IFF Research
  • Wu, P., Wang, J. and Wang, X., 2016. A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 68, pp.21-31.
  • Zhang, R., Zhou, A.S., Tahmasebi, S. and Whyte, J., 2019, August. Long-standing themes and new developments in offsite construction: the case of UK housing. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering (Vol. 172, No. 6, pp. 29-35). Thomas Telford Ltd.
Progress 1 Progress 2 Progress 3
Sitejabber
Google Review
Yell

What Makes Us Unique

  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • 100% Customer Satisfaction
  • No Privacy Violation
  • Quick Services
  • Subject Experts

Research Proposal Samples

It is observed that students are stressed when completing their research proposal. Now, they are fine as they are aware of the Dissertation Proposal, which provides the best and highest-quality Dissertation Services to the students. All the Literature Review Example and Research Proposal Samples can be accessed by the students quickly at very minimal value. You can place your order and experience amazing services.


DISCLAIMER : The research proposal samples uploaded on our website are open for your examination, offering a glimpse into the outstanding work provided by our skilled writers. These samples underscore the notable proficiency and expertise showcased by our team in creating exemplary research proposal examples. Utilise these samples as valuable tools to enhance your understanding and elevate your overall learning experience.

X
Welcome to Dissertation Home Work Whatsapp Support. Ask us anything 🎉
Hello Mark, I visited your website Dissertation Home Work. and I am interested in assignment/dissertation services. Thank you.
Chat with us